On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote: > > cramfs is a read-only fs. So we should honour that in inode->mode to > avoid confusion of programs. No no no. This breaks device nodes etc quite badly. A change to mkcramfs might be fine - but it has to conditionalize on the file being a regular file. Not a blanket "everything is read-only". Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this i... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this i... Shane Nay
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so ... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only,... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this i... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Rusty Russell
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Linus Torvalds
- Linus Torvalds