On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote: > Then we might need W bits, but currently they disturb things like > "test" and the perl equivalent, which is quite annoying and > complexifies code. (Yes, I'm selfish too ;-)) Huh??? Consider write-protected floppy. What, you mean that it also should magically change mode of everything? Ditto for any fs mounted r/o. If program considers these bits of st_mode as indication of ability to write into file - program is buggy and should be fixed. Regardless of cramfs. > See what Linus and Al think about this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->m... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in in... Shane Nay
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this i... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Shane Nay
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so ... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only,... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro o... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Rusty Russell
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in in... Linus Torvalds