On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:42:35AM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: > If program considers these bits of st_mode as indication of ability > to write into file - program is buggy and should be fixed. Regardless > of cramfs. Ok, point taken. I fixed the generation of the tree to be crammed into the cramfs image instead. Same code simplification without uglyfication of the kernel ;-) Thanks & Regards Ingo Oeser -- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag> <<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in inode->m... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in in... Shane Nay
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this i... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Shane Nay
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so ... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only,... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro o... Doug McNaught
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour th... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honou... Rusty Russell
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cramfs is ro only, so honour this in in... Linus Torvalds