Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than this email account.
Regards,
Dave
------------------------------------
Jeff Garzik wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Andi Kleen wrote:de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
always MTU sized skbuffs.
One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.
Jeff
