Also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED]: } > de4x5 is probably also buggy in regard to this. } } de4x5 is hopeless. I added nice comment in softnet to it. } Unfortunately it was lost. 8) } } Andi, neither you nor me nor Alan nor anyone are able to audit } all this unnevessarily overcomplicated code. It was buggy, is buggy } and will be buggy. It is inavoidable, as soon as you have hundreds } of drivers. } If they are buggy and unsupported, why aren't they being expunged from the main source tree and placed into a ``contrib'' directory or something for people who may want those drivers? -- || Bill Wendling [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2... kuznet
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as ... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated... kuznet
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... kuznet
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... kuznet
- tulip vs. de4x5 (was Re: Linux 2... Jim Schutt
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Bill Wendling
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... David C. Davies
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... David C. Davies
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0... David Ford