Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

[David C. Davies]

All,

As you can see, I get little time to attend to maintenance chores on the 
de4x5 driver. If there are particular problems that you want sorted out 
please let me know and I'll see what I can do.

Regards,

Dave

------------------------------------------------------

Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
>> de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
>> it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
>> always MTU sized skbuffs.
> 
> 
> One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
> that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.
> 
>       Jeff
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/