On 5/22/19 7:48 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>
>> When CONFIG_GPIO_OF is not defined, struct gpio_chip 'of_node' member does
>> not exist:
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c: In function 'stmfx_pinctrl_probe':
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c:652:17: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no
>> member named 'of_node'
>> pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
>>
>> Fixes: 1490d9f841b1 ("pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver")
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delau...@st.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
>> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
>> index eba872c..bb64aa0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
>> @@ -648,7 +648,9 @@ static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> pctl->gpio_chip.base = -1;
>> pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio = pctl->pctl_desc.npins;
>> pctl->gpio_chip.can_sleep = true;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
>> pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
>> +#endif
>
> This is pretty ugly. Will STMFX ever be used without OF support? If
> not, it might be better to place this restriction on the driver as a
> whole.
>
> Incidentally, why is this blanked out in the structure definition?
> Even 'struct device' doesn't do this.
>
config PINCTRL_STMFX
tristate "STMicroelectronics STMFX GPIO expander pinctrl driver"
depends on I2C
depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
select GENERIC_PINCONF
select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
select MFD_STMFX
The issue is due to COMPILE_TEST: would "depends on OF || (OF &&
COMPILE_TEST)" be better ?
>> pctl->gpio_chip.need_valid_mask = true;
>>
>> ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(pctl->dev, &pctl->gpio_chip, pctl);
>
