On Mon, 20 May 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> When CONFIG_GPIO_OF is not defined, struct gpio_chip 'of_node' member does
> not exist:
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c: In function 'stmfx_pinctrl_probe':
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c:652:17: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no
> member named 'of_node'
> pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
>
> Fixes: 1490d9f841b1 ("pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver")
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delau...@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> index eba872c..bb64aa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> @@ -648,7 +648,9 @@ static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> pctl->gpio_chip.base = -1;
> pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio = pctl->pctl_desc.npins;
> pctl->gpio_chip.can_sleep = true;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
> pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
> +#endif
This is pretty ugly. Will STMFX ever be used without OF support? If
not, it might be better to place this restriction on the driver as a
whole.
Incidentally, why is this blanked out in the structure definition?
Even 'struct device' doesn't do this.
> pctl->gpio_chip.need_valid_mask = true;
>
> ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(pctl->dev, &pctl->gpio_chip, pctl);
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
