On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > It's logical that PageDirty should never be get for ramfs, and a ramfs > page should never have buffers on it. What? No no no. You're obviously right that ramfs will never have buffers on the page, but why shouldn't a ramfs page be dirty? Of _course_ a ramfs page is dirty - that's the only thing that tells the VM that it can't be thrown out. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test... Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Philipp Rumpf
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Chris Mason
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Chris Mason
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Dan Aloni
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Dan Aloni
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Michael Peddemors
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Alan Cox
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips