On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Philipp Rumpf wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:41:04PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > It must be wrong. > > > > If we have a dirty page on the LRU lists, that page _must_ have a mapping. > > What about pages with a mapping but without a writepage function ? or pages > whose writepage function fails ? The current code seems to simply put the > page onto the active list in that case, which seems just as wrong to me. I noticed the offset of 'mapping' in struct page doesn't match the offset which get resolved at obsolute address 0x0000000c according to the Oops, but it does matches the offset of a_ops in struct address_space, which makes me wonder if it's possible that a_ops == NULL. Suggestions? -- Dan Aloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Philipp Rumpf
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Chris Mason
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Chris Mason
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Dan Aloni
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Dan Aloni
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Michael Peddemors
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Alan Cox
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds