Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok, pre-5 should have all the same places you found already fixed, but
> please do give it some heavy-duty testing to make sure there isn't
> anything hidden..
I've beaten on it fairly heavily with the BUG in there as you suggested,
with no problems.
This kernel even seems a little faster:
Test machine: 64 meg, 500 Mhz K6, IDE, Ext2, Blocksize=4K
Test: dbench 48
pre4 9.5 MB/sec 11 min 6 secs
pre5 10.8 MB/sec 9 min 48 secs
I think it would be an awfully good idea to let the BUG out for mass
consumption:
+ if (PageDirty(page)) BUG();
remove_page_from_inode_queue(page);
remove_page_from_hash_queue(page);
page->mapping = NULL;
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Zlatko Calusic
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Dan Aloni
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Zlatko Calusic
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Philipp Rumpf
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Daniel Phillips
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Chris Mason
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Rik van Riel
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Chris Mason
- Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12 Linus Torvalds

