On Sonntag, 29. Juli 2007, Kasper Sandberg wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 01:41 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I never tried Con's patchset, for two reasons: > > I tried his 2.4 patches ones, and I never saw any improvements. So when > > people were reporting huge improvements with his SD scheduler, I compared > > that with the reports of huge improvements with his 2.4 kernel patches. > > Well thats a reason if there ever were one... >
yes, it is. The fans claimed once lots of stuff that was not true for me. So why believing them 'now'? > > ... > > The second: too many patches. I only would have tried one or two, but the > > ck-patchset is a lot bigger.. and I am a little bit uneasy about that. > > so use only the scheduler? nobody forces you to do many things.. but which one is needed? http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.22/2.6.22-ck1/patches/ six patches who start with 'sched-' and which one is needed? and which is not? Can I only use sched-staircase-deadline-cpu-scheduler.patch or do I need the others too? > Better than old vanilla yes, but than SD? well, you should give it a > try. > see above. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
