> * Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] As far as im concerned, i may be forced to unofficially maintain > > SD for my own systems(allthough lots in the gaming community is bound > > to be interrested, as it does make games lots better)
On 30/07/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'd encourage you to do it - in fact i already tried to prod Peter > Williams into doing exactly that ;) The more reality checks a scheduler > has, the better. [ Btw., after the obvious initial merging trouble it > should be much easier to keep SD maintained against future upstream > kernels due to the policy modularity that CFS introduces. (and which > policy-modularity should also help reduce the size and complexity of the > SD patch.) ] <chuckle> You're advocating plugsched now? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
