* George Sescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30/07/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i'd encourage you to do it - in fact i already tried to prod Peter
> > Williams into doing exactly that ;) The more reality checks a
> > scheduler has, the better. [ Btw., after the obvious initial merging
> > trouble it should be much easier to keep SD maintained against
> > future upstream kernels due to the policy modularity that CFS
> > introduces. (and which policy-modularity should also help reduce the
> > size and complexity of the SD patch.) ]
>
> <chuckle>
>
> You're advocating plugsched now?
hm, the way you posited this question implies that you see an
inconsistency in my position or that it surprised you - i cannot explain
the '<chuckle>' in any other way :) Which bit do you see as inconsistent
and/or which bit surprised you and why?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
