Hi Babu,

On 10/11/2018 1:33 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> @@ -883,20 +883,20 @@ static int __init intel_rdt_late_init(void)
>       rdt_online = state;
>  
>       for_each_alloc_capable_rdt_resource(r)
> -             pr_info("Intel RDT %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
> +             pr_info("RESCTRL %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
>  
>       for_each_mon_capable_rdt_resource(r)
> -             pr_info("Intel RDT %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
> +             pr_info("RESCTRL %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
>  

I'm sorry - I know it was me who suggested the change to RESCTRL but I
clearly did not consider the final result which is (for example):

resctrl: RESCTRL %s allocation detected

Perhaps we could just drop that RESCTRL text?

Reinette

Reply via email to