Hi Babu, On 10/11/2018 1:33 PM, Moger, Babu wrote: > @@ -883,20 +883,20 @@ static int __init intel_rdt_late_init(void) > rdt_online = state; > > for_each_alloc_capable_rdt_resource(r) > - pr_info("Intel RDT %s allocation detected\n", r->name); > + pr_info("RESCTRL %s allocation detected\n", r->name); > > for_each_mon_capable_rdt_resource(r) > - pr_info("Intel RDT %s monitoring detected\n", r->name); > + pr_info("RESCTRL %s monitoring detected\n", r->name); >
I'm sorry - I know it was me who suggested the change to RESCTRL but I clearly did not consider the final result which is (for example): resctrl: RESCTRL %s allocation detected Perhaps we could just drop that RESCTRL text? Reinette