On 10/12/2018 02:40 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 10/11/2018 1:33 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> @@ -883,20 +883,20 @@ static int __init intel_rdt_late_init(void)
>> rdt_online = state;
>>
>> for_each_alloc_capable_rdt_resource(r)
>> - pr_info("Intel RDT %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
>> + pr_info("RESCTRL %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
>>
>> for_each_mon_capable_rdt_resource(r)
>> - pr_info("Intel RDT %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
>> + pr_info("RESCTRL %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
>>
>
> I'm sorry - I know it was me who suggested the change to RESCTRL but I
> clearly did not consider the final result which is (for example):
>
> resctrl: RESCTRL %s allocation detected
>
> Perhaps we could just drop that RESCTRL text?
Yes. We can drop it.
>
> Reinette
>
