On 30/08/17 15:51, Vijay Viswanath wrote:
> From: Sahitya Tummala <stumm...@codeaurora.org>
> 
> There is a rare scenario in HW, where the first clear pulse could
> be lost when the actual reset and clear/read of status register
> are happening at the same time. Fix this by retrying upto 10 times
> to ensure the status register gets cleared. Otherwise, this will
> lead to a spurious power IRQ which results in system instability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stumm...@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vvisw...@codeaurora.org>

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 46 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index d636251..42a65ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -995,17 +995,52 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling(struct 
> sdhci_host *host,
>               sdhci_msm_hs400(host, &mmc->ios);
>  }
>  
> -static void sdhci_msm_voltage_switch(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +static void sdhci_msm_dump_pwr_ctrl_regs(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +     struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> +     struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> +
> +     pr_err("%s: PWRCTL_STATUS: 0x%08x | PWRCTL_MASK: 0x%08x | PWRCTL_CTL: 
> 0x%08x\n",
> +                     mmc_hostname(host->mmc),
> +                     readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_STATUS),
> +                     readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_MASK),
> +                     readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL));
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq)
>  {
>       struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>       struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>       u32 irq_status, irq_ack = 0;
> +     int retry = 10;
>  
>       irq_status = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_STATUS);
>       irq_status &= INT_MASK;
>  
>       writel_relaxed(irq_status, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CLEAR);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * There is a rare HW scenario where the first clear pulse could be
> +      * lost when actual reset and clear/read of status register is
> +      * happening at a time. Hence, retry for at least 10 times to make
> +      * sure status register is cleared. Otherwise, this will result in
> +      * a spurious power IRQ resulting in system instability.
> +      */
> +     while (irq_status & readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem +
> +                             CORE_PWRCTL_STATUS)) {
> +             if (retry == 0) {
> +                     pr_err("%s: Timedout clearing (0x%x) pwrctl status 
> register\n",
> +                                     mmc_hostname(host->mmc), irq_status);
> +                     sdhci_msm_dump_pwr_ctrl_regs(host);
> +                     WARN_ON(1);
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +             writel_relaxed(irq_status,
> +                             msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CLEAR);
> +             retry--;
> +             udelay(10);
> +     }
> +
>       if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON | CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF))
>               irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS;
>       if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW | CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH))
> @@ -1017,13 +1052,17 @@ static void sdhci_msm_voltage_switch(struct 
> sdhci_host *host)
>        * switches are handled by the sdhci core, so just report success.
>        */
>       writel_relaxed(irq_ack, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL);
> +
> +     pr_debug("%s: %s: Handled IRQ(%d), irq_status=0x%x, ack=0x%x\n",
> +             mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, irq, irq_status,
> +             irq_ack);
>  }
>  
>  static irqreturn_t sdhci_msm_pwr_irq(int irq, void *data)
>  {
>       struct sdhci_host *host = (struct sdhci_host *)data;
>  
> -     sdhci_msm_voltage_switch(host);
> +     sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(host, irq);
>  
>       return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
> @@ -1106,7 +1145,6 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host 
> *host, unsigned int clock)
>       .get_max_clock = sdhci_msm_get_max_clock,
>       .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
>       .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling,
> -     .voltage_switch = sdhci_msm_voltage_switch,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_msm_pdata = {
> @@ -1257,7 +1295,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>        * acknowledged. Otherwise power irq interrupt handler would be
>        * fired prematurely.
>        */
> -     sdhci_msm_voltage_switch(host);
> +     sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(host, 0);
>  
>       /*
>        * Ensure that above writes are propogated before interrupt enablement
> 

Reply via email to