Alan Cox writes: > >From a practical point of view that currently means 'delete Linus tree pcmcia > regardless of what you are doing' since the modules from David Hinds and Linus > pcmcia are not 100% binary compatible for all cases. However, deleting that code would render a significant number of ARM platforms without PCMCIA support, which would be real bad. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Tobias Ringstrom
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Hinds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds