On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:42:34PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > It's the socket drivers which _aren't_ in the kernel source which are most > likely to exhibit this problem. Anything in the kernel tree was probably > converted by Linus, and hence done right. As there are so few socket drivers > in his tree, the amount of code duplication wasn't immediately obvious > either. The i82365 and tcic drivers in the 2.4 tree have not been converted to use the thread stuff; as far as I know, the yenta driver is the only socket driver that works at all in 2.4. -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (f... Tobias Ringstrom
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (f... Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Hinds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (f... Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread... Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread... Alan Cox