On 16 Nov 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: [hardlinks on directories] > I don't believe it's inherently impossible in Linux anymore. In fact, Yes, it is. bindings are asymmetrical. And that's the reason why they work while links to directories do not. > vfsbinds provide a lot of the same kind of functionality; the main > difference between vfsbinds and hard links are that the former (a) can > cross filesystem boundaries and (b) aren't persistent. Here's one more: you can't rename across the binding boundary. They _are_ mounts, so they avoid all that crap with loop creation on rename, etc. Take a generic DAG and try to implement rename() analog on it. Have fun catching the cases that would make the graph disconnected. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir Jean-Marc Saffroy
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir Linus Torvalds
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir Alexander Viro
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir Jean-Marc Saffroy
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir Alexander Viro
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmd... Jean-Marc Saffroy
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour o... Alexander Viro
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour o... David Feuer
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behavio... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent beh... Alexander Viro
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent beh... David Feuer
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent beh... Alexander Viro
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent beh... Nix
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent beh... Alexander Viro
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir Guest section DW
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir Alexander Viro
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir Eric Paire
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmd... Guest section DW
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir Jesse Pollard