On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > That's all nice and good, but I still have no coherent explanation why
> > measuring across allocation domains makes sense.
>
> Is this in reaction to this one?
>
> >> 5) Put multiple threads into a single measurement group
>
> If we fix it to say "threads from the same CAT group" does it fix things?
>
> We'd like to have measurement groups use a single RMID ... if we
> allowed tasks from different CAT groups in the same measurement
> group we wouldn't be able to split the numbers back to report the
> right overall total for each of the CAT groups.
Right. And the same applies to CPU measurements. If we have threads from 3
CAT groups running on a CPU then the aggregate value (except for bandwidth
which can be computed by software) is useless.
Thanks,
tglx
