On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:00:26PM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote: > From: Shanker Donthineni <shank...@codeaurora.org> > > On the Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies Falkor v1 CPU, memory accesses may > allocate TLB entries using an incorrect ASID when TTBRx_EL1 is being > updated. Changing the TTBRx_EL1[ASID] and TTBRx_EL1[BADDR] fields > separately using a reserved ASID will ensure that there are no TLB entries > with incorrect ASID after changing the the ASID. > > Pseudo code: > write TTBRx_EL1[ASID] to a reserved value > ISB > write TTBRx_EL1[BADDR] to a desired value > ISB > write TTBRx_EL1[ASID] to a desired value > ISB
While the new ASID probably won't have incorrect TLB entries, the reserved ASID will have random entries from all over the place. That's because in step 1 you change the ASID to the reserved one while leaving the old BADDR in place. There is a brief time before changing the ASID when speculative page table walks will populate the TLB with entries tagged with the reserved ASID. Such entries are never removed during TLB shoot-down for the real ASID, so, depending on how this CPU implements the walk cache, you could end up with intermediate level entries still active and pointing to freed/reused pages. It will eventually hit an entry that looks global with weird consequences. We've been bitten by this in the past on arm32: 52af9c6cd863 ("ARM: 6943/1: mm: use TTBR1 instead of reserved context ID"). -- Catalin