On Wednesday, 28 February 2007 20:32, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 02/28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > --- workqueue.c.org 2007-02-28 18:32:48.000000000 +0530 > > > +++ workqueue.c 2007-02-28 18:44:23.000000000 +0530 > > > @@ -718,6 +718,8 @@ static void cleanup_workqueue_thread(str > > > insert_wq_barrier(cwq, &barr, 1); > > > cwq->should_stop = 1; > > > alive = 1; > > > + if (frozen(cwq->thread)) > > > + thaw(cwq->thread); > > > } > > > spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock); > > > > Unfortunately, the above code is mm-only. Is the analogous fix for > > 2.6.21-rc2 > > viable? > > I am sorry, I lost track of this problem. As for 2.6.21, > create_freezeable_workqueue > doesn't work and conflict with suspend. Why can't we remove it from XFS as you > suggested before?
Yes, we can (preparing a patch). I was just curious. :-) Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
