Hi! > > OK, thanks. > > > > We can (I think) do pretty much the same with some additional complications > > in worker_thread() (check !cpu_online() after try_to_freeze() and break). > > Okay, but I've just finished the patch that removes the freezability of > workqueues (appended), so can we please do this in a separate one?
Hmm, nothing obviously wrong with the patch (ACK), but xfs people should ack this one, too: 'is it okay to let xfs run while suspending' is not a trivial question. > Since freezable workqueues are broken in 2.6.21-rc > (cf. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116855740612755, > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=117261312523921&w=2) > it's better to remove them altogether for 2.6.21 and change the only user of > them (XFS) accordingly. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
