On Monday, August 01, 2016 12:28:50 PM Steve Muckle wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:34:36AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> ...
> > Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > +++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > @@ -144,17 +144,47 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct
> > return cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(policy, freq);
> > }
> >
> > -static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> > - unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
> > +static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long dl_util, dl_max;
> > + unsigned long cfs_util, cfs_max;
> > + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + struct dl_bw *dl_bw = dl_bw_of(cpu);
> > + struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> > +
> > + if (rt_prio(current->prio)) {
> > + *util = ULONG_MAX;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dl_max = dl_bw_cpus(cpu) << 20;
> > + dl_util = dl_bw->total_bw;
> > +
> > + cfs_max = rq->cpu_capacity_orig;
> > + cfs_util = min(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg, cfs_max);
> > +
> > + if (cfs_util * dl_max > dl_util * cfs_max) {
> > + *util = cfs_util;
> > + *max = cfs_max;
> > + } else {
> > + *util = dl_util;
> > + *max = dl_max;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> Last Friday I had put together a similar patch based on Peter's. I need
> the flags field for the remote wakeup support. My previous plan,
> installing a late callback in check_preempt_curr that gets requested
> from the earlier existing CFS callback, was not working out since those
> two events don't always match up 1:1.
>
> Anyway one way that my patch differed was that I had used the flags
> field to keep the behavior the same for both RT and DL. That happens
> later on in this series for RT but the DL policy is modified as above.
> Can the DL policy be left as-is and discussed/modified in a separate
> series?
No problem with that as far as I'm concerned, but in that case it won't be
a Peter's patch any more. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
