On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, Horst von Brand wrote: > [Chopped down Cc: list] > "James A. Sutherland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > [...] > > > > It does not know them. Correct. But with persistent module storage, it > > > _could_ know them. > > > No it cannot. The desired levels have not been defined: there are no > > desired levels to determine! Don't tamper with settings you don't need > > to. > > The problem (AFAIU) is that if the levels aren't set on startup, they are > random in some cases. So set them on startup. NOT when the driver is first loaded. Put it in the rc.d scripts. > So you'd have to save (at least) the fact that they > have been initalized. No, you don't. > Just that would be easy: Set aside a word in the > kernel, which is set to 0 when booting, and which then gets the value 1 > when the hardware is initialized. Why bother? Just set the settings *explicitly* on boot, rather than in the driver itself. > For more fancy stuff, splitting the > module into data/code (as I suggested) should do the trick with minimal > impact on the rest. No need. Let userspace save it somewhere, if that's needed. James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jamie Lokier
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Tim Riker
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Gerhard Mack
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Gerhard Mack