On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, James A. Sutherland wrote: > On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, Gerhard Mack wrote: > > Sure .. lets see you start a laptop in class or buisness meeting and have > > everyone turn to look at you wondering why your laptop let off an ear > > piercing shreak because the hardware defaults to all settings max. > > That only happens if the driver is stupid enough to try guessing "correct" > volume settings. If it leaves well alone until it KNOWS the correct settings, > there is no ear piercing shriek. Nor is there any break in the sound if you > were listening to something from the mixer. > > > And you will _STILL_ have that shriek for 1/2 - 1 second before the > > userspace app loads. > > Wrong. The userspace app is the one triggering the device init, when it gives > the sound driver the correct volume settings. There is no half second delay. > > > And no we couldn't unplug either the mike or the speakers since they come > > embedded in the laptop's case. > > > > I don't see in any of your trolling an answer for this problem. > > It isn't trolling, and there is a perfectly simple answer, as I have already > explained. > And if I don't use modules? Gerhard -- Gerhard Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] <>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Gerhard Mack
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Gerhard Mack
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Gerhard Mack
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Evan Jeffrey
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Martin Dalecki
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox