[Chopped down Cc: list] "James A. Sutherland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote: [...] > > It does not know them. Correct. But with persistent module storage, it > > _could_ know them. > No it cannot. The desired levels have not been defined: there are no > desired levels to determine! Don't tamper with settings you don't need > to. The problem (AFAIU) is that if the levels aren't set on startup, they are random in some cases. So you'd have to save (at least) the fact that they have been initalized. Just that would be easy: Set aside a word in the kernel, which is set to 0 when booting, and which then gets the value 1 when the hardware is initialized. For more fancy stuff, splitting the module into data/code (as I suggested) should do the trick with minimal impact on the rest. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alon Ziv
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jamie Lokier
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Tim Riker
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Gerhard Mack
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland