On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 23:42:25 +0100, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 04:06:37PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> for SGI, or SGI would have to be willing to assign some code to FSF. > > Which is the standard procedure that the FSF requires for all it's > programs to be able to defend them ... or sell them under a different license. Not that they would, but they could, if they really wanted to. Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Aaron Sethman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Thomas Pornin
- Re: non-gcc linux? Ion Badulescu
- Re: non-gcc linux? Eric W. Biederman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Ralf Baechle
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-t... Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Michael Meissner