On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 23:42:25 +0100, Marc Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 04:06:37PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> for SGI, or SGI would have to be willing to assign some code to FSF.
>
> Which is the standard procedure that the FSF requires for all it's
> programs to be able to defend them
... or sell them under a different license. Not that they would, but they
could, if they really wanted to.
Ion
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Aaron Sethman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Thomas Pornin
- Re: non-gcc linux? Ion Badulescu
- Re: non-gcc linux? Eric W. Biederman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Ralf Baechle
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-t... Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Michael Meissner

