> Perhaps I did not explain myself, or perhaps I misunderstand your > comments. I was responding to a comment that we could just copy some of > the optimizations from Pro64 over into gcc. Whether Pro64 understands > gcc syntax is immaterial to this question is it not? If gcc is architecturally unable to do ia64 well, pro64 is free software and both understand the same syntax Im at a bit of a loss why that is productive ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Thomas Pornin
- Re: non-gcc linux? Ion Badulescu
- Re: non-gcc linux? Eric W. Biederman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Ralf Baechle
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-t... Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Michael Meissner
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-t... Thomas Pornin
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-t... Kai Henningsen