> This is also a nice thought, but there is an obstacle. > The Pro64 tools are Open Source and GPLed: > > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/Pro64/ > > SGI retains the copyright to the code. > > As far as I know, the FSF owns the copyright to all code in the gcc > suite. If improvements were taken from the Pro64 tools the copyright to > said code would have to remain. Pro64 is free software and Pro64 understands gcc syntax. No problem at all. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-... Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: non-gcc linux? D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: non-gcc linux? Jeff Garzik
- Re: non-gcc linux? D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-... Aaron Sethman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Marc Lehmann
- Re: non-gcc linux? Thomas Pornin
- Re: non-gcc linux? Ion Badulescu
- Re: non-gcc linux? Eric W. Biederman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox