[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Riker) wrote on 02.11.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 1. C++ style comments > > Occurs in over 4000 lines of source and header files. :-( Should be > converted to ansi c comments? We will probably want to just skirt this > issue for now as the next rev of ANSI C is likely to include ANSI C++ > style comments. I don't know about the *next* ANSI C, but the *current* ANSI C is ISO C 99 (ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (E)) and *does* have C++ style comments. ANSI at least will happily sell you a PDF. MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Ralf Baechle
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where ... Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Michael Meissner
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where ... Thomas Pornin
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-tes... Kai Henningsen
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Tom Rini
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Mike Galbraith
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Wayne . Brown
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? J . A . Magallon
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Wayne . Brown