On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 07:07:12PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > 1. There are architectures where some other compiler may do better > > optimizations than gcc. I will cite some examples here, no need to argue > > I think we only care about this when they become free software. SGI's pro64 is free software and AFAIK is able to compile a kernel on IA64. It is also not clear if gcc will ever produce good code on IA64. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Gábor Lénárt
- Re: non-gcc linux? Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Jes Sorensen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... David Lang
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: non-gcc linux? D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: non-gcc linux? Jeff Garzik
- Re: non-gcc linux? D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Aaron Sethman
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Alan Cox