> > > I think the whole notion of mcsafe here is 'wrong'. This copy variant > > > simply > > > reports the kind of trap that happened (#PF or #MC) and could arguably be > > > extended to include more types if the hardware were to generate more. > > > > What would a better name be? memcpy_ret() or so? > > Yeah, uhmm.. naming. More options from the lack of inspiration department: > > memcpy_trap() > memcpy_ex()
I like "memcpy_trap" - thanks Peter. I'll redo this part with all the other fixes suggested by Ingo. -Tony
