On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:19:42AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I think the whole notion of mcsafe here is 'wrong'. This copy variant > > simply > > reports the kind of trap that happened (#PF or #MC) and could arguably be > > extended to include more types if the hardware were to generate more. > > What would a better name be? memcpy_ret() or so?
Yeah, uhmm.. naming. More options from the lack of inspiration department: memcpy_trap() memcpy_ex()
