On 07-02-16, 16:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > Use the observation that cpufreq_governor_limits() doesn't have to > get to the policy object it wants to manipulate by walking the > reference chain cdbs->policy_dbs->policy, as the final pointer is > actually equal to its argument, and make it access the policy > object directy via its argument. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 17 ++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Why the hell did we write it that way earlier ? :) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> -- viresh
