On 05-02-16, 03:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > Since policy->cpu is always passed as the second argument to > dbs_check_cpu(), it is not really necessary to pass it, because > the function can obtain that value via its first argument just fine. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 2 +- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 5 +++-- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 2 +- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 6 ++---- > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> -- viresh
