On 06-02-16, 13:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> 
> Since policy->cpu is always passed as the second argument to
> dbs_check_cpu(), it is not really necessary to pass it, because
> the function can obtain that value via its first argument just fine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes from v2:
> - Rebase on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8241231/
>   and on the v3 of [8/10] without [9/10].

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to