Re: [OT] Re: Possible C++ safe header project - Re:[Criticism] On the discussion about C++ modules

[Timur Tabi]

** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700


> Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that 
> remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of hand has the 
> potential for shooting ourselves in the foot.  I'd rather do it slowly 
> *now* instead of having to do it wholesale when the tools force us.

I agree.  I think removed C++ reserved keywords from the header files should be
the FIRST priority, not the last.  How many are there, anyway?

new 
delete
virtual
class
operator

That's all I can think of now.



-- 
Timur Tabi - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com

When replying to a mailing-list message, please direct the reply to the mailing list 
only.  Don't send another copy to me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/