Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|> ** Reply to message from Stephen Satchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
|> Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:54:46 -0700
|>
|>
|> > Linus has the final say, of course, but to suggest that any changes that
|> > remove name collisions between C and C++ be rejected out of hand has the
|> > potential for shooting ourselves in the foot. I'd rather do it slowly
|> > *now* instead of having to do it wholesale when the tools force us.
|>
|> I agree. I think removed C++ reserved keywords from the header files should be
|> the FIRST priority, not the last. How many are there, anyway?
|>
|> new
|> delete
|> virtual
|> class
|> operator
|>
|> That's all I can think of now.
and and_eq bitand bitor bool catch compl const_cast dynamic_cast explicit
false friend mutable namespace not not_eq or or_eq private protected
public reinterpret_cast static_cast template this throw true try typeid
typename using wchar_t xor xor_eq
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
SuSE Labs completely different."
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
