On Sun, Oct 15 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
>    Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 11:19:24 +0200
>    From: Torben Mathiasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
>    It seems reasonable. We'd been thinking of makeing proc_name part
>    of the host structure, but no need for that if we just do the
>    above.
> 
> Either fix is ok by me, but it does seem that enforcing proc_name
> initialization might be the better fix long term.

Agreed, it'll clean it up also. Lets make both. If Linus moves the
remove_proc_entry people will stop oopsing, and I'll have some 
time to test the proc_name changes.


-- 
Torben Mathiasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux ThunderLAN maintainer 
http://tlan.kernel.dk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to