On Sat, Oct 14 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 12:12:39 +0200
> From: Torben Mathiasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Are there any reason why sym53c8xx and others initialize proc_name
> only if an adapter was actually found (or in the sym case, if a
> pcibus was found)?
>
> I see no particular reason. Why not code up the patch to fix all
> these cases so we can find out? :-) I would recommend putting them all
> into the host structure for that driver, unless there is some weird
> reason the driver absolutely must generate the string at run time.
>
Yeah, lets find out. I'll cook it up.
Linus,
What do you think. Something you would accept for 2.4?
--
Torben Mathiasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux ThunderLAN maintainer
http://tlan.kernel.dk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
