On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, David S. Miller wrote: > > The loop would be a no-op but the remove_proc_entry call would not. > Perhaps you didn't notice that there too? It's pretty close to the > loop :-) Ok. In fact, it's in the _wrong_ part. That remove_proc_entry() should be there in the same place where we remove the entry in teh list, wouldn't you say? Makes tons more sense that way, doesn't crash, and is understandable. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops Gérard Roudier
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops Torben Mathiasen