On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 01:50:44PM +0300, Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aside of that pre-processor noice I don't know if 2.96 is really Please keep in mind that there is no such definite thing as gcc-2.96. There is the redhat version (with unknown changes to the snapshot it bases on) and countless fsf snapshots of 2.96. They act similarly, but not the same, complicating any discussion about it. -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?... Alan Cox
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?... Jesse Pollard
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?... Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Michael Meding
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jamie Lokier
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Matti Aarnio
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jamie Lokier
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Nix
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox