Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial > > compiler, with all the consequences I said. > > I agree about the "unreleased and unofficial" part, but it's not quite > that broken and experimental. Everything that is shipped with Red Hat > Linux (the distribution itself, Powertools, the extra CDs for Europe, > etc) compiles and works without problems. > Some programs needed patches, but that was much like updating from egcs > 1.1.2 to gcc 2.95 - stricter checks for clean code. Hah! Even the preprocessor is broken in 2.96. I have to use an older one. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?... Michael Peddemors
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?... Marc Lehmann
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?... Alexander Viro
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?... Alan Cox
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?... Jesse Pollard
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?... Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Michael Meding
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jamie Lokier
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Matti Aarnio
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jamie Lokier
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Nix
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann