On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 04:39:06PM -0400, Horst von Brand 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wouldn't mind, either, if this didn't mean that programs compiled
> > on rehdat need redhat versions of the development toolchain / runtime
> > environment to use them :(
> 
> Has happened on and off with each distribution I've ever played with. The
> point being?

That what you say is simply not true, so what's _your_ point in claiming
this?

One never needed suse's or redhat's glibc to run binaries created on their
platforms. Likewise one never needed their libstdc++ or their toolchain,
the official ones (released by the official maintainers) always were
enough.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to