Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?

[Marc Lehmann]

On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 04:26:38PM +0100, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which still makes it an broken, experimental, unreleased and unofficial
> > compiler, with all the consequences I said.
> 
> And didnt you write something called pgcc once.

Oh yes, of course while providing full binary compatibility. You can
even mix & match objects from gcc and pgcc and agcc, no kidding. No
distribution that used pgcc was ever binary incompatible to any other
distribution, which is the point you keep ignoring.

> *PLONK*

No need to get personal ;) I had hoped you could keep to *technical*
reasoning, though :(

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/