What does everyone have against gcc 2.95 on this list? I've been compiling kernels successfully (read: not one single (ever) error in compilation) with gcc 2.95.2 for more than a year now. What's the big deal? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? John Anthony Kazos Jr.
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Larry McVoy
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Alexander Viro
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Jamie Lokier
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Kim Shepherd
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Jamie Lokier
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? doctor
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Michael Meding
- Re: Why does everyone hate gcc 2.95? Horst von Brand