On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 01:20:58PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you say so.... However, I am not sure that you (we?) can actually
> > control it.
> 
> You are excused this one and only time since I am fortunate enough to
> never have met you but listen carefully now:

And you are excused this once only to have only read what people have
quoted instead of reading what I actually wrote:

   OTOH, [EMAIL PROTECTED] might get pressed into not doing incompatible
   changes, although I trust drepper to act truely honest.

> > Well, I actually do think that this has happened with glibc-2.1.
>
> And this I take as personal insult.  Who the f*ck do you think you are
> to claim the right of making such a statement?

Well, the glibc-2.1 on redhat disks acted differently than the glibc-2.1
in the cvs repository or on the ftp servers, but that does not mean that
the actual glibc code is the culprit. Again, please read what I actually
wrote, not only the parts that others have quoted.

Thank you for doing that.

> This is so completely insane that I really have not the slightest idea
> how you can make

Probably that's becausde I didn't write what you think I did write since
you only read selected snippets of my mail.

> whatsoever.  If you cannot find anybody I demand a public apology from
> you.

VV. Really, there is no need to fight over misquoted mails. Please do calm
down.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to