James Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Daniel Phillips wrote: > That sounds likely to be a common case. Every real bookstore I've seen > lately has had books on C, C++, Linux, Windows etc. programming - I have > yet to see one with a since ANSI or IEEE document for sale! > OTOH, these standards documents aren't the most readable of text. Perhaps > a human-friendly explanation of the standard would be more widely read? For C there is K&R II - that's should be enough explanation. Christoph -- Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Jes Sorensen
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Stephen Williams
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Horst von Brand
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Justin . Skists
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ James Sutherland
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Alan Shutko
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Christoph Hellwig
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Horst von Brand
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Vadim Lebedev