James Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> That sounds likely to be a common case. Every real bookstore I've seen
> lately has had books on C, C++, Linux, Windows etc. programming - I have
> yet to see one with a since ANSI or IEEE document for sale!
> OTOH, these standards documents aren't the most readable of text. Perhaps
> a human-friendly explanation of the standard would be more widely read?
For C there is K&R II - that's should be enough explanation.
Christoph
--
Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Jes Sorensen
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Stephen Williams
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Horst von Brand
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Justin . Skists
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ James Sutherland
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Alan Shutko
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Christoph Hellwig
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Horst von Brand
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts
- RE: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Marty Fouts
- Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++ Vadim Lebedev

